Beware: "Free" Medical Care Will Kill You - On Purpose!

The
great debate on medical care is taking place in this year's
presidential campaign. Much is made of the fact that care costs too
much and that government isn't doing enough to provide coverage for the
poor and elderly. Be careful - you may regret ever-encouraging
government - controlled medicine.
Case in point, this report from England (Don't treat the old and unhealthy, say doctors)
where full government health care is "provided" free to every citizen.
For years, free-market advocates like myself have had to endure
lectures from our little socialist friends about the glories of "free"
health care. We keep pointing out that nothing is free - and now the
folks in England may be paying for that health care with their lives - literally.
When
government gets overburdened and revenues don't keep up with all the
grand plans of a horde of politicians, someone has to feel the pain.
Today, England's treasury can't keep up with the massive costs of
health care. So the bureaucrats, such fiscally responsible folks - just
serving the people, you understand - have decided the best way to cut
costs is to stop providing health care to those who are too old or
those who leave "unhealthy lives." Of course, government gets to decide
who they are.
It's important to note here that the reason health
care cost so much today is because government got involved in health
care in the first place. It mostly started for the United States back
in the 1960s under Lyndon Johnson's
"compassionate" policy of universal health care. From that time, a visit
to the doctor went from costing a few dollars to hundreds, affordable
only through insurance payments. It's no coincidence that the quality
of health care also started to go down as the costs soared. Socialized
medicine does not work. Period.
The force driving this policy
today is a sinister policy called Sustainable Development, as outlined
in a UN document called Agenda 21. Sustainable Development is a
horrific mix of socialism and fascism that is now taking over the
world. It’s unhealthy for the economy, your private property, and your
health as Sustainable Medicine begins to take over your local hospital
and family doctor. (SUSTAINABLE MEDICINE + SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT = DUTY TO DIE)
Decisions on quality care will not be made by them but by mindless,
faceless government agencies who feel not an ounce of passion for your
elderly mom or your ailing son.
Welcome to the new utopia of
Sustainable Development now being brought to you by the U.S. Congress,
the President, your state legislature, and your city council. Remember
their compassionate promises to make your life better under Sustainable
Development as you watch your loved ones die because they have been
refused health care.
By the way, this wouldn't happen in a free
market where you would make the decisions about your health care. But
of course, that's not politically correct.
Visit Tom DeWeese's Blog - DeWeese's Daily Dose
Tom
DeWeese is one of the nation’s leading advocates of individual liberty, free
enterprise, property rights and back-to-basics education. For over thirty years
he has fought against government oppression.
In
1988, Mr. DeWeese established the American Policy Center (APC), an activist think tank
headquartered in
Mr.
DeWeese makes regular appearances on radio and television talk shows and has
articles published in several national publications.
Click here to return to TRA's Issue CXLIV Index.
Learn about Mr. Stolyarov's novel, Eden against the Colossus, here.Read Mr. Stolyarov's new comprehensive treatise, A Rational Cosmology, explicating such terms as the universe, matter, space, time, sound, light, life, consciousness, and volition, here.
Disclaimer: The presence of the following advertisement serves as an attempt to eventually enable The Rational Argumentator to generate sufficient revenues to cover the costs of its domain name. TRA does not foresee making an actual profit with these advertisements for a long time. The advertisement does not necessarily reflect the views of TRA or any of its contributors, and the readers are encouraged to judge it on its own merits.
The
Rational Argumentator