How to Approach Unjust Laws -- Part 1 of 2 -- Video
In the first part of this two-part video presentation, Mr. Stolyarov discusses three types of unjust laws: 1) laws which only bring harm on the individual himself and do not require him to hurt other people, 2) laws which require the active infliction of harm on others, and 3) laws which give one the option to inflict harm on others. How should a person seeking to live justly and morally approach these laws? When is it morally acceptable to obey unjust laws, and when is it morally obligatory to violate them? What role does prudence have to play in the matter? Watch this video for Mr. Stolyarov’s answers.
Please help promote this video by going to this page and giving it a rating of five stars, as well as embedding it on your websites and sharing it with others.
G. Stolyarov II is an actuary, science fiction novelist, independent philosophical essayist, poet, amateur mathematician, composer, contributor to Enter Stage Right, Le Quebecois Libre, Rebirth of Reason, and the Ludwig von Mises Institute, Senior Writer for The Liberal Institute, former weekly columnist for GrasstopsUSA.com, and Editor-in-Chief of The Rational Argumentator, a magazine championing the principles of reason, rights, and progress. Mr. Stolyarov also publishes his articles on Helium.com and Associated Content to assist the spread of rational ideas. He holds the highest Clout Level (10) possible on Associated Content and is one of Associated Content's Page View Millionaires. Mr. Stolyarov has also written a science fiction novel, Eden against the Colossus, a non-fiction treatise, A Rational Cosmology, and a play, Implied Consent. You can watch his YouTube Videos. Mr. Stolyarov can be contacted at gennadystolyarovii@yahoo.com.
Click here to return to TRA's Issue CLXXXI Index.
Learn about Mr. Stolyarov's novel, Eden against the Colossus, here.Read Mr. Stolyarov's comprehensive treatise, A Rational Cosmology, explicating such terms as the universe, matter, space, time, sound, light, life, consciousness, and volition, here.
The
Rational Argumentator