Eliminating Death -- Part 12 -- Cognitive Dissonance and Euphemisms Regarding Death -- Video

G. Stolyarov II
 
Issue CLXXXIII 
January 5, 2009
Recommend this page.
A sample image

Mr. Stolyarov discusses the most rampant cognitive dissonance in all of humanity. Most sane, reasonable, non-sadistic people perceive the death of any individual – even a disagreeable or hostile individual – as a tragedy.

  Yet many of those same people see death in general as natural or even desirable. This is a blatant contradiction that can only be morally resolved in one way – in thinking that death on any level is a horrendous calamity. Throughout human history, most individuals have been prevented from confronting this cognitive dissonance because of a series of euphemisms used to avoid referring to individual death as death. Mr. Stolyarov advises everyone to stop using expressions such as “Person X has passed on.” or “Person X is no longer with us.” or even references to “the late Person X.” Rather, it is best to call events by their proper names and refer to deceased people as dead, in order to bring clarity to the exact nature of the situation.  

Please help promote this video by going to this page and giving it a rating of five stars, as well as embedding it on your websites and sharing it with others.


Recommend this page.

This TRA feature has been edited in accordance with TRA's Statement of Policy.

Click here to return to TRA's Issue CLXXXIII Index.

Learn about Mr. Stolyarov's novel, Eden against the Colossus, here.

Read Mr. Stolyarov's comprehensive treatise, A Rational Cosmology, explicating such terms as the universe, matter, space, time, sound, light, life, consciousness, and volition, here.

Read Mr. Stolyarov's four-act play, Implied Consent, a futuristic intellectual drama on the sanctity of human life, here.