{"id":1417,"date":"2013-08-10T23:36:27","date_gmt":"2013-08-10T23:36:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/?p=1417"},"modified":"2014-02-09T04:05:27","modified_gmt":"2014-02-09T04:05:27","slug":"house-divided-nsa","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/blog\/2013\/08\/house-divided-nsa\/","title":{"rendered":"A House Divided Over NSA Spying on Americans – Article by Ron Paul"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\"The<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Ron Paul
\n<\/big><\/big><\/strong><\/span><\/div>\n
August 10, 2013<\/big><\/span><\/div>\n
Recommend this page<\/a>.<\/strong><\/div>\n
******************************<\/div>\n

In late July 2013, the House debate on the Defense Appropriations bill for 2014 produced a bit more drama than usual. After hearing that House leadership would do away with the traditional \u201copen rule\u201d allowing for debate on any funding limitation amendment, it was surprising to see that Rep. Justin Amash\u2019s (R-MI) amendment was allowed on the Floor. In the wake of National Security Agency (NSA) whistleblower Edward Snowden\u2019s revelations about the extent of US government spying on American citizens, Amash\u2019s amendment sought to remove funding in the bill for some of the NSA programs.<\/p>\n

Had Amash\u2019s amendment passed, it would have been a significant symbolic victory over the administration\u2019s massive violations of our Fourth Amendment protections. But we should be careful about believing that even if it had somehow miraculously survived the Senate vote and the President\u2019s veto, it would have resulted in any significant change in how the Intelligence Community would behave toward Americans. The US government has built the largest and most sophisticated spying apparatus in the history of the world.<\/p>\n

The NSA has been massively increasing the size its facilities, both at its Maryland headquarters and in its newly built (and way over-budget) enormous data center in Utah. Taken together, these two facilities will be seven times larger<\/a> than the Pentagon! And we know now that much of the NSA\u2019s capacity to intercept information has been turned inward, to spy on us.<\/p>\n

As NSA expert James Bamford wrote<\/a> earlier this year about the new Utah facility:<\/p>\n

\u201cThe heavily fortified $2 billion center should be up and running in September 2013. Flowing through its servers and routers and stored in near-bottomless databases will be all forms of communication, including the complete contents of private emails, cell phone calls, and Google searches, as well as all sorts of personal data trails\u2014parking receipts, travel itineraries, bookstore purchases, and other digital \u201cpocket litter.\u201d It is, in some measure, the realization of the \u201ctotal information awareness\u201d program created during the first term of the Bush administration\u2014an effort that was killed by Congress in 2003 after it caused an outcry over its potential for invading Americans\u2019 privacy.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

But it happened anyway.<\/p>\n

In late July we have seen two significant prison-breaks, one in Iraq<\/a>, where some 500 al-Qaeda members broke out of the infamous Abu Ghraib prison, which the US built, and another 1,000 escaped in a huge break<\/a> in Benghazi, Libya \u2013 the city where the US Ambassador was killed by the rebels that the US government helped put in power. Did the US intelligence community, focused on listening to our phone calls, not see this real threat coming?<\/p>\n

Rep. Amash\u2019s amendment was an important move to at least bring attention to what the US intelligence community has become: an incredibly powerful conglomeration of secret government agencies that seem to view Americans as the real threat. It is interesting that the votes on Amash\u2019s amendment divided the House not on party lines. Instead, we saw the votes divided between those who follow their oath to the Constitution, versus those who seem to believe that any violation of the Constitution is justified in the name of the elusive \u201csecurity\u201d of the police state at the expense of liberty. The leadership \u2013 not to my surprise — of both parties in the House voted for the police state.<\/p>\n

It is encouraging to see the large number of votes crossing party lines in favor of the Amash amendment. Let us hope that this will be a growing trend in the House \u2013 perhaps the promise that Congress may once again begin to take its duties and obligations seriously. We should not forget, however, that in the meantime another Defense Appropriations bill passing really means another \u201cmilitary spending\u201d bill. The Administration is planning for a US invasion of Syria, more military assistance to the military dictatorship in Egypt, and more drones and interventionism. We have much work yet to do.<\/p>\n

\n
\n

Ron Paul, MD, is a former three-time Republican candidate for U. S. President and Congressman from Texas.
\n<\/strong><\/p>\n

This article is reprinted with permission.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Ron Paul August 10, 2013 Recommend this page. ****************************** In late July 2013, the House debate on the Defense Appropriations bill for 2014 produced a bit more drama than usual. After hearing that House leadership would do away with the traditional \u201copen rule\u201d allowing for debate on any funding limitation amendment, it was surprising to see that Rep. Justin Amash\u2019s (R-MI) amendment was allowed on the Floor. In the wake of National Security Agency (NSA) whistleblower Edward Snowden\u2019s revelations about…<\/p>\n

Read More Read More<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[2254,2299,76,444,616,370,2188,2253,624,59,369,368,756,65,841,1940,447,202,25,2300],"class_list":["post-1417","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics","tag-4th-amendment","tag-amash-amendment","tag-barack-obama","tag-congress","tag-constitution","tag-data-center","tag-edward-snowden","tag-fourth-amendment","tag-justin-amash","tag-liberty","tag-national-security-agency","tag-nsa","tag-police-state","tag-ron-paul","tag-secrecy","tag-security","tag-spying","tag-surveillance","tag-united-states","tag-utah"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1417","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1417"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1417\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2006,"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1417\/revisions\/2006"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1417"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1417"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1417"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}