{"id":435,"date":"2012-07-22T04:50:40","date_gmt":"2012-07-22T04:50:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/?p=435"},"modified":"2014-02-09T05:21:27","modified_gmt":"2014-02-09T05:21:27","slug":"ice-and-economics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/blog\/2012\/07\/ice-and-economics\/","title":{"rendered":"Ice and Economics – Article by David J. Hebert"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\"The<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
David J. Hebert
\n<\/big><\/big><\/strong><\/span><\/div>\n
July 21, 2012<\/big><\/span><\/div>\n
Recommend this page<\/a>.<\/strong><\/div>\n
******************************<\/div>\n
\n
\n

What can ice teach us about economics? We\u2019ll see, but let\u2019s begin with some fundamentals.<\/p>\n

Prices, property rights, and profit (and loss) lead to information, incentives, and innovation. This simple statement contains nearly every lesson necessary for a free and prosperous society. But what do these words mean?<\/p>\n

Prices<\/em> convey information about relative scarcities and communicate to us the relative value of competing uses of a resource. They also economize on the acquisition of knowledge. When we see the price of a resource rise, market actors understand the need to use less of the resource. What they don\u2019t know, however, is whether this rise is due to a disaster that destroyed some of the stock of that resource (an inward supply shift) or if a new, more valuable use for that resource has been discovered (an outward demand shift). These facts are irrelevant for a person who is currently using the resource, but from a societal level, her using less is necessary. If there is a disaster, we would want people to use less of it so that everyone else can still use some. If there is a new, more valuable use discovered, we would want the original users to use less so that more could be allocated towards this new use.<\/p>\n

The Right to Exclude<\/strong><\/p>\n

Property rights<\/em> refers not only to the right to use a resource, but also to the right to exclude others from its use. In this sense property rights provide the incentive to allocate the use of a resource efficiently across time, for example, to conserve it for later. With firmly established and enforced property rights, not only does the owner not have to worry about someone else taking his things but he also doesn\u2019t have to rush out to gather the resources as quickly as he can. A situation where there are no property rights is susceptible to what is called the \u201ctragedy of the commons,\u201d where the resource gets depleted too quickly and never has a chance to replenish.<\/p>\n

Profit (and loss)<\/em> leads to innovation. Earning a profit is akin to being rewarded for doing something good. Suffering a loss is the opposite, a punishment for doing something wrong. In this case, the deed being done is the attempt to allocate scarce resources to where their will earn their highest return. People who successfully do this are rewarded with monetary gain, which we call \u201cprofit.\u201d People who fail to do this experience what we call \u201closs.\u201d In doing so, economic actors learn what works and what does not. Reducing the profitability of an activity through taxes or legislation or sheltering people from losses, therefore, acts to retard this learning process and stifles innovation.<\/p>\n

This lesson is exemplified in early nineteenth-century Boston with the rise of the American natural ice trade. In 1806 Frederic Tudor sailed a ship full of ice from Boston to the Bahamas. Two years\u00a0earlier\u00a0Tudor had begun experimenting with insulation with the goal of bringing ice to the Bahamas.\u00a0 When he was ready to set sail, he found that the ship captains refused to carry his cargo for fear of damaging their vessels. So he bought his own brig, the Favorite<\/em>, and set sail February 10, 1806. He arrived in Martinique with a large quantity of ice still intact and began selling.\u00a0The Bahamians loved the ice, which they had never seen before. Yet\u00a0that first year Tudor lost a substantial sum of money, although he proved that ice could be shipped to the Bahamas. Now the objective became doing it at a profit.\u00a0 Convinced his idea would be wildly successful, he continued his attempts to drive down costs and increase demand.<\/p>\n

Higher Return<\/strong><\/p>\n

Meanwhile, as the price of the ice on the ponds rose, the people of Boston gained the information that the ice would bring a higher return in the Bahamas, thus they used less themselves and sold the ice to the Bahamians. In 1840 the ponds in the Boston area were explicitly divided, giving each person on the lake the right to exclude everyone else from harvesting any ice that wasn\u2019t theirs. This allowed Tudor, for example, to invest in his ice and let it freeze longer so that it could better survive the long journey from Boston to India, which entailed crossing the equator twice and sailing around the tip of Africa. As Tudor earned profit from his venture, more people were attracted to the ice.<\/p>\n

To continue to earn a profit, therefore, he had to find a way to outcompete everyone else.\u00a0In 1825 Tudor enlisted the help of Nathaniel Wyeth, one of his suppliers. Tudor noticed that Wyeth\u2019s ice was always significantly cheaper than everyone else\u2019s and was cut in neater blocks which packed more easily. Wyeth had converted some old farm plows into ice-cutting plows and had fastened horseshoes with spikes to allow horses to pull these modified plows across the ice. By scoring the ice in such a fashion, Wyeth could break uniform sized blocks much quicker than his competitors, who were using hand saws that produced very rough and uneven edges.<\/p>\n

These wouldn\u2019t be the only contributions of Wyeth, as he went on to invent many other cost saving techniques. For example, Wyeth developed a\u00a0conveyor-belt system that would haul the ice from the pond into the waiting icehouse. \u00a0He also invented bigger plows that could cut more blocks at once and poles that were used to guide the floating ice blocks onto the\u00a0conveyor\u00a0belt; \u00a0refined the above-ground icehouse, which allowed ice to be stored anywhere in the world for months on end without any external source of refrigeration.<\/p>\n

New Insulation<\/strong><\/p>\n

Tudor and Wyeth also experimented with new means of insulating the ice from the heat, discovering that sawdust was not only a fantastic insulator but was also cheaply available from the sawmills around Boston. They also taught their customers new ways to use the ice, including making ice cream and storing the ice in iceboxes to preserve foods longer.<\/p>\n

In short the three Ps lead to the three Is: Prices, property rights, and profit (and loss) lead to information, incentives, and innovation.\u00a0 With these firmly in place, a free and prosperous society will follow.<\/p>\n

David Hebert<\/a> is a Ph.D. Fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

This article was originally published by The Foundation for Economic Education<\/a>.
\n<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

David J. Hebert July 21, 2012 Recommend this page. ****************************** What can ice teach us about economics? We\u2019ll see, but let\u2019s begin with some fundamentals. Prices, property rights, and profit (and loss) lead to information, incentives, and innovation. This simple statement contains nearly every lesson necessary for a free and prosperous society. But what do these words mean? Prices convey information about relative scarcities and communicate to us the relative value of competing uses of a resource. They also economize…<\/p>\n

Read More Read More<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[419,7,6],"tags":[1081,634,1082,1083,22,1087,1084,84,1080,793,1088,116,1086,1085,497,428,587,322,853,529,21,1049],"class_list":["post-435","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-business-2","category-economics","category-history","tag-19th-century","tag-competition","tag-dave-hebert","tag-david-j-hebert","tag-demand","tag-entrepreneurship","tag-frederic-tudor","tag-freedom","tag-ice","tag-incentives","tag-information","tag-innovation","tag-loss","tag-nathaniel-wyeth","tag-price","tag-profit","tag-property-rights","tag-prosperity","tag-resources","tag-scarcity","tag-supply","tag-tragedy-of-the-commons"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/435","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=435"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/435\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2112,"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/435\/revisions\/2112"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=435"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=435"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=435"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}