{"id":5180,"date":"2015-10-27T19:40:42","date_gmt":"2015-10-27T19:40:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/?p=5180"},"modified":"2015-10-27T19:40:42","modified_gmt":"2015-10-27T19:40:42","slug":"soda-taxes-and-health","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/blog\/2015\/10\/soda-taxes-and-health\/","title":{"rendered":"On Soda Taxes and Purported Health Benefits – Article by Peter Van Doren"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\"The<\/a>Peter Van Doren
\n<\/big><\/big><\/strong><\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
October 27, 2015<\/span>
\n<\/big><\/div>\n
******************************<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n

This week, the New York Times<\/em> editorial board wrote<\/a> in support of greater taxes on sweetened drinks, citing new research<\/a> from a team Mexican and American researchers. They praise the novel design of the tax, which is levied on drink distributors rather than consumers. This caused the tax to be included in shelf prices, making the increase in total cost clear to consumers. The research found that soda consumption fell 12 percent in a year, and 17 percent among the poorest Mexicans.<\/p>\n

The Times<\/em> admits that we do not know whether any health benefits will actually result from soda taxes.\u00a0 In this article in <\/a>Regulation<\/a>,<\/em> the University of Pennsylvania\u2019s Jonathan Klick and Claremont McKenna\u2019s Eric Helland examined the effects of soda taxes. They conclude that a one percent increase in soda taxes led to a five percent reduction in soda consumption among young people.\u00a0 But consumers substituted to other beverages.\u00a0 A 6-calorie reduction in soda consumption was accompanied by an 8-calorie increase in milk consumption and a 2-calorie increase in juice consumption. Thus, the tax on soda led to an increase in overall calorie consumption, which offset the benefits of falling soda consumption. Moreover, there was \u201cno statistically significant effect of soda taxes on body weight or the likelihood of being obese or overweight\u201d.<\/p>\n

Peter Van Doren is editor of the quarterly journal Regulation<\/em> and an expert in the regulation of housing, land, energy, the environment, transportation, and labor. He has taught at the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs (Princeton University), the School of Organization and Management (Yale University), and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. From 1987 to 1988 he was the postdoctoral fellow in political economy at Carnegie Mellon University. His writing has been published in the Wall Street Journal<\/em>, the Washington Post<\/em>, Journal of Commerce<\/em>, and the New York Post<\/em>. Van Doren has also appeared on CNN, CNBC, Fox News Channel, and Voice of America.<\/strong><\/p>\n

He received his bachelor\u2019s degree from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and his master\u2019s degree and doctorate from Yale University.<\/strong><\/p>\n

This work by Cato Institute<\/a> is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Peter Van Doren October 27, 2015 ****************************** This week, the New York Times editorial board wrote in support of greater taxes on sweetened drinks, citing new research from a team Mexican and American researchers. They praise the novel design of the tax, which is levied on drink distributors rather than consumers. This caused the tax to be included in shelf prices, making the increase in total cost clear to consumers. The research found that soda consumption fell 12 percent in…<\/p>\n

Read More Read More<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,662],"tags":[4192,997,793,814,4381,4379,261,4380,1348,658],"class_list":["post-5180","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-economics","category-science-2","tag-cato-institute","tag-health","tag-incentives","tag-new-york-times","tag-obesity","tag-peter-van-doren","tag-science","tag-soda-taxes","tag-taxation","tag-taxes"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5180","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5180"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5180\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5181,"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5180\/revisions\/5181"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5180"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5180"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5180"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}