{"id":549,"date":"2012-09-24T03:43:54","date_gmt":"2012-09-24T03:43:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/?p=549"},"modified":"2014-02-09T05:06:56","modified_gmt":"2014-02-09T05:06:56","slug":"a-republic-not-a-democracy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/blog\/2012\/09\/a-republic-not-a-democracy\/","title":{"rendered":"A Republic, Not a Democracy – Article by Ron Paul"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\"The<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Ron Paul
\n<\/big><\/big><\/strong><\/span><\/div>\n
September 23, 2012<\/big><\/span><\/div>\n
Recommend this page<\/a>.<\/strong><\/div>\n
******************************<\/div>\n
\n

Early September 2012 marked the conclusion of the grand taxpayer-funded spectacles known as the national party conventions.\u00a0 It is perhaps very telling that while $18 million in tax dollars<\/a>\u00a0was granted to each party for these lavish ordeals, an additional $50 million <\/a>each\u00a0was needed for security in anticipation of the inevitable protests at each event.\u00a0 This amounts to a total of $136 million in taxpayer funds for strictly partisan activities – a drop in the bucket relative to our disastrous fiscal situation, but disgraceful nonetheless.\u00a0 Parties should fund their own parties, not the taxpayer.<\/p>\n

At these conventions, leaders determined, or pretended to determine, who they wished to govern the nation for the next four years amidst inevitable, endless exaltations of democracy.\u00a0 Yet we are not a democracy.\u00a0 In fact, the founding fathers found the concept of democracy very dangerous.<\/p>\n

Democracy is majority rule at the expense of the minority.\u00a0 Our system has certain democratic elements, but the founders never mentioned democracy in the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, or the Declaration of Independence.\u00a0 In fact, our most important protections are decidedly undemocratic.\u00a0 For example, the First Amendment protects free speech.\u00a0 It doesn’t – or shouldn’t – matter if that speech is abhorrent to 51% or even 99% of the people.\u00a0 Speech is not subject to majority approval.\u00a0 Under our republican form of government, the individual, the smallest of minorities, is protected from the mob.<\/p>\n

Sadly, the constitution and its protections are respected less and less as we have quietly allowed our constitutional republic to devolve into a militarist, corporatist social democracy.\u00a0 Laws are broken, quietly changed and ignored when inconvenient to those in power, while others in positions to check and balance do nothing.\u00a0 The protections the founders put in place are more and more just an illusion.<\/p>\n

This is why increasing importance is placed on the beliefs and views of the president.\u00a0 The very narrow limitations on government power are clearly laid out in Article, 1 Section 8, of the Constitution.\u00a0 Nowhere is there any reference to being able to force Americans to buy health insurance or face a tax\/penalty, for example.\u00a0 Yet this power has been claimed by the executive and astonishingly affirmed by Congress and the Supreme Court. \u00a0Because we are a constitutional republic, the mere popularity of a policy should not matter.\u00a0 If it is in clear violation of the limits of government and the people still want it, a Constitutional amendment is the only appropriate way to proceed. \u00a0However, rather than going through this arduous process, the Constitution was in effect, ignored and the insurance mandate was allowed anyway.<\/p>\n

This demonstrates how there is now a great deal of unhindered flexibility in the Oval Office to impose personal views and preferences on the country, so long as 51% of the people can be convinced to vote a certain way.\u00a0 The other 49% on the other hand have much to be angry about and protest under this system.<\/p>\n

We should not tolerate the fact that we have become a nation ruled by men, their whims and the mood of the day, and not laws.\u00a0 It cannot be emphasized enough that we are a republic, not a democracy and, as such, we should insist that the framework of the Constitution be respected and boundaries set by law are not crossed by our leaders.\u00a0 These legal limitations on government assure that other men do not impose their will over the individual, rather, the individual is able to govern himself.\u00a0\u00a0 When government is restrained, liberty thrives.<\/p>\n

Representative Ron Paul (R \u2013 TX), MD, was a three-time Republican candidate for U. S. President. See his Congressional webpage<\/a> and his official campaign website<\/a>.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

This article has been released by Dr. Paul into the public domain and may be republished by anyone in any manner.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Ron Paul September 23, 2012 Recommend this page. ****************************** Early September 2012 marked the conclusion of the grand taxpayer-funded spectacles known as the national party conventions.\u00a0 It is perhaps very telling that while $18 million in tax dollars\u00a0was granted to each party for these lavish ordeals, an additional $50 million each\u00a0was needed for security in anticipation of the inevitable protests at each event.\u00a0 This amounts to a total of $136 million in taxpayer funds for strictly partisan activities – a…<\/p>\n

Read More Read More<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[1301,1303,616,1305,28,1299,84,30,59,1306,86,1300,1304,29,65,230,1302,961,1185,25],"class_list":["post-549","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics","tag-article-1","tag-checks-and-balances","tag-constitution","tag-democracy","tag-democrat","tag-democratic","tag-freedom","tag-libertarian","tag-liberty","tag-majority-rule","tag-national-convention","tag-political-parties","tag-republic","tag-republican","tag-ron-paul","tag-rule-of-law","tag-section-8","tag-subsidy","tag-taxpayers","tag-united-states"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/549","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=549"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/549\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2092,"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/549\/revisions\/2092"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=549"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=549"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=549"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}