{"id":6957,"date":"2017-03-27T19:28:49","date_gmt":"2017-03-27T19:28:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/?p=6957"},"modified":"2017-03-28T01:10:56","modified_gmt":"2017-03-28T01:10:56","slug":"iceland-alt-right-problem","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/blog\/2017\/03\/iceland-alt-right-problem\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Iceland Doesn’t Have an Alt-Right Problem – Article by Camilo G\u00f3mez"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n
\n
\"The<\/a>Camilo G\u00f3mez<\/span>
\n<\/big><\/big><\/strong><\/div>\n
******************************<\/div>\n
\n

With the recent rise to prominence of right-wing populist parties across Europe, it\u2019s refreshing that Iceland has remained largely immune to such nationalistic rhetoric. On the continent, figures like Marine Le Pen in France and Geert Wilders in the Netherlands are capitalizing on what political scientists are calling a third wave of European populism that began after the international financial crisis of 2008. These parties are characterized by their anti-immigrant, and specifically, anti-Muslim sentiments. They fashion themselves the \u201cprotectors\u201d of their homelands\u2019 traditional culture against cosmopolitan globalism.<\/p>\n

Yet, tiny Iceland has resisted this dirty brand of politics because of the rise of social movements that challenged the power structure of the Icelandic political establishment after the financial crisis of 2008. Unlike in other European countries, these social movements transformed themselves into a political movements, filling the vacuum of traditional center-right and center-left political parties, while also preventing far-right political projects from succeeding.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

For starters, Iceland is a relatively young country that only became independent in 1944. It is a parliamentary democracy, based on coalitions because the Althing (parliament) has 63 members but a single party rarely has a clear majority. Unlike other Nordic countries, Iceland has been governed by the right for most of its history, either from the liberal conservative Independence Party or the center-right agrarian Progressive Party.<\/p>\n

This changed after the international financial crisis of 2008, which led all three Icelandic commercial banks to default. The crisis generated massive anger as Icelanders didn\u2019t know what was going to happen with their savings. This led to massive protests<\/a> that culminated in the resignation of the Prime Minister who was a member of the Independence Party. \u00a0Consequently, in April 2009, a left-wing coalition by the Social Democratic Alliance and the Left-Green Movement formed a government together for the first time in the country\u2019s history.<\/p>\n

This grassroots activism led to the appearance of outsider political projects like the now defunct Best Party<\/a>, which started as political satire but ended with its leader J\u00f3n Gnarr<\/a> winning the mayoral election in Reykjav\u00edk in 2010. More importantly, grassroots activism was further encouraged by the Panama Papers, which revealed<\/a> that the Prime Minister of Iceland, Sigmundur Dav\u00ed\u00f0 Gunnlaugsson of the Progressive Party and his wife, had an undisclosed account in an offshore tax haven. The ensuing protests<\/a> became the largest in Iceland\u2019s history, and made the Prime Minister resign<\/a>. This led the way for the Pirate Party<\/a> \u2014 a loose collection of anarchists, hackers and libertarians \u2014 to rise in prominence. Because of the Pirates, the national discussion shifted to a more socially tolerant narrative of a society willing to be open to the world.<\/p>\n

Thus, Iceland\u2019s 2016 elections presented very different options from the relatively traditional Independence Party and Progressive Party or the Social Democratic Alliance and Left-Green Movement. In addition to the Pirate Party<\/a>,\u00a0 voters could also choose from the Bright Party<\/a>, an eclectic socially liberal party, and the Reform Party<\/a>, a new liberal party formed by defectors of the Independence Party. The elections led to a center-right coalition<\/a> between the Independence Party, the Reform Party and the Bright Party.<\/p>\n

Rather than blaming immigrants for their problems, Icelanders confronted the political class and created new parties that didn\u2019t resemble the wave of far-right populism. Now even the government realizes that Iceland needs immigrants<\/a>, skilled and unskilled, to fulfill the demand in different aspects of the Icelandic economy. Contrary to other countries in Europe, and despite its size, Iceland had been willing to receive refugees<\/a>, and the number of immigrants<\/a> in Iceland keeps growing year by year. In times of demagoguery, Iceland remains friendly to foreigners. One can only hope that the world learn from this small country that foreigners bring prosperity.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Camilo G\u00f3mez is a blogger at The Mitrailleuse<\/a> and the host of Late Night Anarchy<\/a> podcast. He can be found in Twitter at @camilomgn<\/a>. He is a Young Voices Advocate.<\/strong><\/p>\n

This article was published by The Foundation for Economic Education<\/a> and may be freely distributed, subject to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License<\/a>, which requires that credit be given to the author. Read the original article<\/a>.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Camilo G\u00f3mez ****************************** With the recent rise to prominence of right-wing populist parties across Europe, it\u2019s refreshing that Iceland has remained largely immune to such nationalistic rhetoric. On the continent, figures like Marine Le Pen in France and Geert Wilders in the Netherlands are capitalizing on what political scientists are calling a third wave of European populism that began after the international financial crisis of 2008. These parties are characterized by their anti-immigrant, and specifically, anti-Muslim sentiments. They fashion themselves…<\/p>\n

Read More Read More<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[87,41,5],"tags":[4711,5125,2778,711,2664,2665,362,1283,2112,38,5126,1734],"class_list":["post-6957","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-culture","category-philosophy","category-politics","tag-alt-right","tag-camilo-gomez","tag-classical-liberalism","tag-fascism","tag-fee","tag-foundation-for-economic-education","tag-free-speech","tag-islam","tag-liberalism","tag-politics-2","tag-scandinavia","tag-tolerance"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6957","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6957"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6957\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6962,"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6957\/revisions\/6962"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6957"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6957"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rationalargumentator.com\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6957"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}