![\"\"](\"https:\/\/transhumanist-party.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/logo_bg-150x150-1.png\"){kind=logo}
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Gennady Stolyarov II<\/strong><\/p>\n Unfortunately, due to the two major political parties’ extensively lobbied-for extraordinarily high thresholds to ballot access, only two questions made it to the 2026 General Election ballot. They are the same as Questions 6 and 7 in the 2024 General Election, where both of these questions received a majority of votes. The Nevada Constitution requires a ballot question to be passed by the voters twice in two consecutive elections before the measure is able to amend the Nevada Constitution. While Nevada voters approved Questions 6 and 7, the United States Transhumanist Party and Nevada Transhumanist Party remain neutral on Question 6 and opposed to Question 7.<\/p>\n Summary<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Nevada State Question 6 \u2013 Right to Abortion Initiative<\/a>: Neutral<\/strong> Wording of Question: <\/strong><\/em>\u201cShould the Nevada Constitution be amended to create an individual\u2019s fundamental right to an abortion, without interference by state or local governments, whenever the abortion is performed by a qualified healthcare professional until fetal viability or when necessary to protect the health or life of the pregnant individual at any point during the pregnancy?\u201d <\/em>(More information on BallotPedia<\/a>.)<\/p>\n Position of the U.S. Transhumanist Party and Nevada Transhumanist Party:<\/strong>\u00a0The U.S. Transhumanist Party and Nevada Transhumanist Party are intentionally and conscientiously neutral on the question of abortion, which is one of the most divisive and intractable issues in American politics today. Its intractability stems from the existence of an inherent conflict of rights, which cannot be resolved using contemporary technology.<\/p>\n Section LXXXIV of the U.S. Transhumanist Party Platform<\/a> offers a potential future solution to this divisive issue in the form of ectogenesis, \u201cthe ability of organisms to be incubated and to grow to the point of independent survival, within an artificial environment that provides such organisms with all the necessities of biological survival and development.\u201d Ectogenesis posses the promise of \u201calleviating the burdens of human pregnancy and rendering the divisive debate over abortion obsolete by reconciling the right to life of a fetus with the freedom of a woman to choose not to carry that fetus.\u201d<\/p>\n However, ectogenesis for humans is not yet available. During the present time, abortion is being utilized to an escalating extent by both major political parties as a wedge issue designed, through the extreme responses to it from both sides, to polarize and divide the population over situations that are unlikely to affect most people personally. It is for this reason that the U.S. Transhumanist Party de-emphasizes the abortion issue in its Platform and rhetoric. Under the status quo, this issue cannot be constructively resolved. We need technology, such as ectogenesis, to render abortion, and especially the abortion debate, obsolete.<\/p>\n The U.S. Transhumanist Party\u2019s founder, Zoltan Istvan, who is personally a supporter of abortion rights, articulated this point of view in his August 3, 2019, editorial in the New York Times, \u201cThe Abortion Debate Is Stuck. Are Artificial Wombs the Answer?<\/a>\u201d<\/p>\n The U.S. Transhumanist Party also recognizes that its members have a broad spectrum of views on the abortion issue. The USTP, in striving to be a big-tent organization, has intentionally avoided creating any manner of litmus test on this issue vis-\u00e0-vis its membership.<\/p>\n The U.S. Transhumanist Party does note, by way of a factual observation, that abortion is currently legal in Nevada statute up to 24 weeks (6 months), and thus if Ballot Question 6 is defeated, this would not affect the status quo in regard to the legality and availability of abortions in Nevada. Ballot Question 6 proposes to establish a right to abortion within the Nevada Constitution and would extend the timeframe of legal abortion \u201cuntil fetal viability or when necessary to protect the health or life of the pregnant individual at any point during the pregnancy\u201d. If enacted, Ballot Question 6 would thus likely broaden the timeframe during which abortions would be legal, in many cases substantially beyond 6 months.<\/p>\n Accordingly, individual members are free to vote their conscience, or to abstain from voting, on Ballot Question 6, however they may choose.<\/p>\n Wording of Question: <\/strong><\/em>\u201cShould the Nevada Constitution be amended to require voters to either present photo identification to verify their identity when voting in-person or to provide certain personal information to verify their identity when voting by mail ballot?\u201d <\/em>(More information on BallotPedia<\/a>.)<\/p>\n Position of the U.S. Transhumanist Party and Nevada Transhumanist Party:<\/strong>\u00a0The U.S. Transhumanist Party and Nevada Transhumanist Party seek to render it easier, not harder, for people (and sentient entities more generally) to be able to vote in elections. As a party with the broadest franchise of any organization known to it \u2013 extending the prerogative for Allied Membership to \u201cany being capable of logical reasoning and of the expression of political opinions\u201d (U.S. Transhumanist Party Constitution, Article II<\/a>, Section X) \u2013 and enabling Allied Members to vote in its internal elections, the USTP is supportive of making voting as accessible as possible to as many sentient entities as possible. The USTP practices this in its internal voting processes, where electronic, ranked-preference voting has been used with significant success and with robust verification that only genuine USTP members (and not, for instance, non-sentient bots that serve a particular special interest) have been the ones casting votes.<\/p>\n While it is not inherently in conflict with the USTP\u2019s values to require some manner of identification to render a person eligible to vote, the USTP does not consider a requirement of voter identification at the time of voting <\/em>to be necessary for this purpose. When an individual registers to vote<\/em>, it is already the case in Nevada that one of several listed forms of identification needs to be produced to demonstrate that this person is a U.S. citizen residing in the district where this person is seeking to register to vote. It is not necessary, once a person is registered to vote, to duplicatively require the same voter identification when that person seeks to cast their ballot. Per the official Arguments Against Passage of Question 7 on the Nevada Sample Ballot, \u201cimpersonating someone else at the polls [almost] never happens. One study<\/a> found that that out of more than a billion votes cast, it happened 31 times \u2013 statistically zero. You have a better chance of getting struck by lightning<\/a>.\u201d<\/p>\n Furthermore, requiring hard-copy voter identification at the time of voting reinforces an already-obsolete paper-based voting system which should, as soon as the technology is viable and deployable at scale, be replaced with an electronic, blockchain-based system using which people could securely verify their identities and vote from the comfort of their homes.<\/p>\n In practice, Ballot Question 7 would limit who is able to vote in Nevada and would, through procedural barriers, deprive some number of U.S. citizens who are legally eligible to vote and properly registered to vote from being able to vote in practice. The U.S. Transhumanist Party and Nevada Transhumanist Party view such an outcome as contrary to their support for enfranchising more sentient entities. Accordingly, the U.S. Transhumanist Party and Nevada Transhumanist Party are opposed to Ballot Question 7.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Gennady Stolyarov II The United States Transhumanist Party and\u00a0Nevada Transhumanist Party offer the following statements of position on the ballot questions currently before Nevada voters in the 2026 General Election. Unfortunately, due to the two major political parties’ extensively lobbied-for extraordinarily high thresholds to ballot access, only two questions made it to the 2026 General Election ballot. They are the same as Questions 6 and 7 in the 2024 General Election, where both of these questions received a majority of…<\/p>\n
\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/transhumanist-party.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/NTP-Logo-9-1-2015.png\"){kind=logo}
The United States Transhumanist Party<\/a> and\u00a0Nevada Transhumanist Party<\/a> offer the following statements of position on the ballot questions currently before Nevada voters in the 2026 General Election.<\/p>\n
\nNevada State Question 7 \u2013 Voter Identification Initiative<\/a>: Oppose<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/a>Nevada State Question 6 \u2013 Right to Abortion Initiative<\/strong><\/em><\/h3>\n
<\/a>Nevada State Question 7 \u2013 Voter Identification Initiative<\/strong><\/em><\/h3>\n