G. Stolyarov II is an actuary, science-fiction novelist, independent philosophical essayist, poet, amateur mathematician, composer, contributor to Transhumanity, Immortal Life, Enter Stage Right, Le Quebecois Libre, Rebirth of Reason, and the Ludwig von Mises Institute, Senior Writer for The Liberal Institute, and Editor-in-Chief of The Rational Argumentator, a magazine championing the principles of reason, rights, and progress. Mr. Stolyarov also publishes his articles on the Yahoo! Contributor Network to assist the spread of rational ideas. He holds the highest Clout Level (10) possible on the Yahoo! Contributor Network and is one of its Page View Millionaires, with over 2 million views.
Mr. Stolyarov holds the professional insurance designations of Associate of the Casualty Actuarial Society (ACAS), Chartered Property Casualty Underwriter (CPCU), Associate in Reinsurance (ARe), Associate in Regulation and Compliance (ARC), Associate in Personal Insurance (API), Associate in Insurance Services (AIS), Accredited Insurance Examiner (AIE), and Associate in Insurance Accounting and Finance (AIAF).
Mr. Stolyarov has written a science fiction novel, Eden against the Colossus, a non-fiction treatise, A Rational Cosmology, and a play, Implied Consent. You can watch his YouTube Videos. Mr. Stolyarov can be contacted at gennadystolyarovii@yahoo.com.
Mr. Stolyarov, I quite enjoy your work. I consider myself an Objectivist in the vein of Ayn Rand. I do like much of what both current camps of Oism do, ARI & the Atlas Society, however I think that they have both fallen away a bit from her original idea’s, especially in regards to homosexuality. I think that these org’s embracing of homosexual behavior is damaging to Objectivism as well as departing from Miss Rand’s limited but genuine thoughts on the subject. I agree with her on the subject, but whenever I try to speak of it I am labeled a “homophobe”, etc. when all I am attempting to show them is how homosexuality is not app. human behavior qua Objectivist ethics. I read Reginald Firehammer’s book and liked it, it’s just too bad that most Oists and Oist groups choose to be backward on this issue. Again, there is more that I like than don’t like with Oism today, but it seems as though moral anarchy is rearing its ugly head within the following at large. Keep up the great work! BTW, are you on Facebook?