What We Have Learned from Afghanistan – Article by Ron Paul

What We Have Learned from Afghanistan – Article by Ron Paul

The New Renaissance Hat
Ron Paul
June 23, 2013

Last week the Taliban opened an office in Doha, Qatar with the US government’s blessing. They raised the Taliban flag at the opening ceremony and referred to Afghanistan as the “Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan”—the name they used when they were in charge before the US attack in 2001.

The US had meant for the Taliban office in Doha to be only a venue for a new round of talks on an end to the war in Afghanistan. The Taliban opening looked very much like a government in exile. The Karzai government was annoyed that the US and the Taliban had scheduled talks without even notifying Kabul. Karzai’s government felt as irrelevant to negotiations on post-war Afghanistan as they soon will be on the ground. It seemed strangely like Paris in 1968, where the US met with North Vietnamese representatives to negotiate a way out of that war, which claimed nearly 60,000 Americans and many times that number of Vietnamese lives.

For years many of us had argued the need to get out of Afghanistan. To end the fighting, the dying, the destruction, the nation-building. To end the foolish fantasy that we were building a Western-style democracy there. We cannot leave, we were told for all those years. If we leave Afghanistan now, the Taliban will come back! Well guess what, after 12 years, trillions of dollars, more than 2,200 Americans killed, and perhaps more than 50,000 dead Afghan civilians and fighters, the Taliban is coming back anyway!

The long US war in Afghanistan never made any sense in the first place. The Taliban did not attack the US on 9/11. The Authorization for the use of force that we passed after the attacks of 9/11 said nothing about a decade-long occupation of Afghanistan. But unfortunately two US presidents have taken it to mean that they could make war anywhere at any time they please. Congress, as usual, did nothing to rein in the president, although several Members tried to repeal the authorization.

Afghanistan brought the Soviet Union to its knees. We learned nothing from it.

We left Iraq after a decade of fighting, and the country is in far worse shape than when we attacked in 2003. After trillions of dollars wasted and tens of thousands of lives lost, Iraq is a devastated, desperate, and violent place with a presence of al-Qaeda. No one in his right mind speaks of a US victory in Iraq these days. We learned nothing from it.

We are leaving Afghanistan after 12 years with nothing to show for it but trillions of dollars wasted and thousands of lives lost. Afghanistan is a devastated country with a weak, puppet government—and now we negotiate with those very people we fought for those 12 years, who are preparing to return to power! Still we learn nothing.

Instead of learning from these disasters brought about by the interventionists and their failed foreign policy, the president is now telling us that we have to go into Syria!

US Army Col. Harry Summers told a story about a meeting he had with a North Vietnamese colonel named Tu while he visiting Hanoi in 1975. At the meeting, Col. Summers told Tu, “You know, you never defeated us on the battlefield.” Tu paused for a moment, then replied, “That may be so. But it is also irrelevant.”

Sadly, that is the story of our foreign policy. We have attacked at least five countries since 9/11. We have launched drones against many more. We have deposed several dictators and destroyed several foreign armies. But, looking around at what has been achieved, it is clear: it is all irrelevant.

Ron Paul, MD, is a former three-time Republican candidate for U. S. President and Congressman from Texas.

This article is reprinted with permission.

2 thoughts on “What We Have Learned from Afghanistan – Article by Ron Paul

  1. RP never answers his question “What have we learned from Afghanistan?” so I’ll provide an answer: nothing.

    The whole affair was predictable. RP is mistaken that the war never made any sense — the Taliban did harbor Al Qaeda & provide it a base of operations, and only after their refusal to stop doing so did the U.S. attack. Nevertheless, as I predicted at the time, the U.S. would not fight a quick effective against its enemies but instead get bogged down in a lengthy nightmare. That it hasn’t turned out worse is actually quite remarkable — the U.S. is the first power since Alexander the Great to not be soundly defeated in the course of an Afghanistan misadventure.

    And the lessons that the America foreign policy elite, the politicians, and the people have taken from this mess… none whatsoever.

  2. Dr. Steele,

    Thank you for your comment. I certainly agree with your answer to Ron Paul’s question, especially in the wake of the material support being provided by the Obama administration to the Syrian rebels, many of whom are associated with the very forces that the United States has, at great cost, fought in Afghanistan.

    Ron Paul’s view on the Afghanistan war, as far as I am aware, is that it was justified to strike against al-Qaeda and thereby to punish the perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks. However, he considered a wholesale war, regime change, and decade-long occupation to be excessive. His fundamental concern is the transformation of a justified retaliatory mission into an institutionalized overseas intervention – an immense “mission creep”, if you will. A few surgical strikes against al-Qaeda bases in Afghanistan would have achieved the same legitimate objectives, while not costing anywhere near as much in lives, resources, and good will from those innocent Afghans who have become victims (sometimes in horrific ways) of this occupation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *